Here’s How Oklahoma State Can Still Make the Playoff

first_imgI know ESPN already called the playoffs for OSU, but that dream has a pulse (kind of).If we can presume that OU is playing for the Big 12 title and College Football Playoff this weekend (and I think everyone is), why can we not presume the same about OSU. That seems sort of odd in a conference where those two teams have the same record and every team plays each other, doesn’t it? Or do we just value playing Tennessee in the non-conference portion that much?Title Odds:Alabama +150Clemson 4/1Oklahoma 7/1N. Dame 8/1Baylor 10/1Mich St 14/1Iowa, Ohio St 20/1Ok St, Florida 25/1Michigan 30/1— RJ Bell (@RJinVegas) November 23, 2015AdChoices广告It seems even more odd when you consider which teams OSU and OU lost to. The Cowboys fell at the hands of the best offense in the country. The Sooners fell to an offense that may or may not be the best on Texas’ campus in Austin (depending on a few of its A-league flag football offenses).It’s because the “when you lost doesn’t matter, please trust us!” argument is really stupid and because the College Football Playoff is a brand competition as much as it is one on the field. And it’s unfortunate that we let the committee sort of re-write how it thinks the season should have gone, but that’s what they said they were going to do all along.As for what it would take for OSU to slip through that back door into a NYE game with the top four? Not as much as you might think. 538 gives OSU a 9 percent chance of sneaking in. Here’s how I see it happening.You have to beat OU and have TCU or Texas beat Baylor. That’s the baseline. The only Big 12 team even potentially getting into the playoffs is the Big 12 champ, whoever that is. So the most likely thing is a TCU win on Friday and an OSU win on Saturday and neither is likely.Then you need the following wins.Florida State or Alabama over FloridaStanford over Notre DameMichigan State or Nebraska over IowaClemson or NC State over North CarolinaAnd actually that might be it. It would technically be better if Iowa won out but I’m trying to be realistic here.The teams in at that point would be Clemson, Alabama and Michigan State. You might need Michigan to beat Ohio State and Nebraska AND MSU to beat Iowa, though I wouldn’t mind seeing a non-Big 10 winning Iowa team getting in just to experience that podcast with Carson. To me, it would be pretty tough to justify putting 11-1 Ohio State (especially with how it looked against Michgan State) or 12-1 Iowa in over the Big 12 champ (though the committee would probably try to find a way). And if Stanford still sneaks in then I’m quitting this sport forever.[1. Until next August.]But yeah, those wins happening aren’t a huge stretch.Stanford is a favorite over Notre Dame. Bama, MSU and Clemson will be favorites in the games OSU needs them to win. The tough one might be TCU or Texas over Baylor. Actually the tough one is going to be OSU over OU on Saturday night.But the playoff door isn’t completely shut. While you’re here, we’d like you to consider subscribing to Pistols Firing and becoming a PFB+ member. It’s a big ask from us to you, but it also comes with a load of benefits like ad-free browsing (ads stink!), access to our premium room in The Chamber and monthly giveaways.The other thing it does is help stabilize our business into the future. As it turns out, sending folks on the road to cover games and provide 24/7 Pokes coverage like the excellent article you just read costs money. Because of our subscribers, we’ve been able to improve our work and provide the best OSU news and community anywhere online. Help us keep that up.last_img read more

876 Old Sugar Barracks Workers and Families to be relocated

first_imgThe Sugar Transformation Unit (STU) of the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries resettlement project is set to benefit some 876 sugar workers and their relatives who have been living in Old Sugar Barracks located in Sugar Dependents Areas of Westmoreland, Trelawny, Clarendon, and St. Thomas. The project is an undertaking of the Unit with support from the European Union (EU) under its Sugar Sector Budget Support Programme (SBS). The EU’s SBS is funded at close to J$9 billion over five years, with the aim of assisting in the economic diversification, social resilience and environmental sustainability of sugar dependent areas.                                                                                                  The estimated cost for the project is $1.7 billion of which roughly $700m will be earmarked for infrastructure work such as roads, electricity, water and bio-digester sewage system and $1 billion for the construction of 398 housing solutions. Head of the STU, George Callaghan, tells the JIS News that the objective of the programme is to relocate persons who are currently living in dilapidated facilities in the Sugar Barracks on four sugar estates, to new housing units in new communities with proper facilities such as roads, water, electricity and bio-digester sewage system.  “In 2008 when the Sugar Transformation Unit did the identification for the project, some of these persons were employed by the sugar estates but quite a number of them were not employed by the estate but were living there for a number of years and are relatives of persons who have been working for the estates for maybe 10, 15, or 30 years ago,” Mr. Callaghan explains. “Persons will be relocated, Barham, Shewsbury and Muesmore; those relating to the Long Pond and Hampden factories in Trelawny will be relocated to Spicy Hill.  For St. Thomas which has the two biggest location sites, persons will be relocated to Hampton Court and Stokes Hall, Golden Grove. In Monymusk Estate in Clarendon, the relocation site will be Springfield in Southern Clarendon,” Mr. Callaghan outlines.              The concrete housing units will consist of one, two, and three bedrooms and will be allocated to the recipients depending on the size of the family to be re-settled.  The average cost to construct the one and two bedroom units is $2.5 million while the three bedrooms will cost between $3 million and $4 million.    According to the STU head, all the units will be titled, and each beneficiary is required to pay for the cost of the title, the remaining costs will be borne by the Government of Jamaica.  The titles will cost between $30,000 and $40,000 each.  The new settlements are expected to support social services infrastructure such as schools, shops, community centres, police stations, where necessary. Land space will also be made available for additional housing as well as small-scale economic activities.  Mr. Callaghan says in terms of social services, preparation has been made for extra lots of land to be allocated for the construction of churches, basic schools and other amenities. He points out that the implementation of the project was far advanced and the infrastructure contracts have all been awarded.  The entire programme he says is expected to be completed by the end of the 2013/2014 financial year. “All the infrastructure work has to be completed before the houses are built,” he states. Share-Con Limited has been awarded the contract for the construction of the Muesmore infrastructure in Westmoreland, while for Barham and Shewsbury also in Westmoreland, the contracts were awarded to D.R Foote Construction.  Alcar Construction and Haulage Company Limited is contracted to Stokes Hall, in St. Thomas and Hampton Court also in St. Thomas, Pavement and Structures Company Limited.  In the case of Spicy Hill in Trelawny, D.R Foote Construction and Springfield in Clarendon, Steel Construction Company Limited has been awarded the contract. “Contracts for the housing solutions are not awarded yet we are just about to go to tender and we are going to tender for the best cost and best types of solutions. We have to ensure that both in terms of cost and completion time the contractors meet these targets because we have targets to meet with the EU in completing this project,” Mr. Callaghan informs. After the re-settlement process is completed the old sugar barracks will be destroyed in order to prevent other persons from living in them. “The key thing is that once we have removed the persons from the sugar barracks land the old dilapidated houses will have to be destroyed because we don’t want people to go and live in them and we have the relocation problem again. In instances where the old barracks lands are the same areas that the housing solutions will be built on whatever remains will be handed over to the parish councils.  If the barracks sites are different from the relocation sites the barracks sites will be put to other uses not for housing necessarily but other economic activities, depending on what the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries decides to do with them,” Mr. Callaghan explains.last_img read more